India's New Labour Codes: The Real Risk Isn't the Law, It's Not Knowing Where You Stand
India's four Labour Codes have been in force since 21 November 2025, and the Central Government notified the final Central Rules on 8 May 2026. Yet, well into the second half of 2026, a large share of Indian companies still haven't fully aligned their contracts, payroll and registrations with the new framework — not out of neglect, but because the rollout itself has been staggered, state by state. For employers, that ambiguity is now the real compliance risk.
What Happens If a Company Hasn't Implemented the Codes
Once a provision of the Codes applies to an establishment, an employer cannot rely on “we haven't updated our policies yet” as a defence. The exposure shows up in layers:
-
Statutory penalties — fines are now codified under each Code, ranging from INR10,000 for poor record-keeping to INR20 lakh (plus possible imprisonment) for repeated, serious violations such as unauthorised retrenchment or closure. The full breakdown by Code is set out below.
-
Retrospective liability — wage claims, PF/ESI interest and damages, and gratuity shortfalls accumulate from the date non-compliance began, not from the date it is discovered.
-
Employee disputes — appointment letters, wage structures or termination processes that don't match the Codes are an easy ground for claims before labour authorities.
-
Deal and funding risk — labour compliance has become a standard line item in due diligence for funding rounds, M&A and vendor onboarding with large corporates.
Penalties Under Each of the Four Codes
The penalty structure is one of the biggest changes from the old regime — fines that used to run into a few hundred or a few thousand rupees under the old Acts now run into lakhs, and several offences carry imprisonment. What applies depends on which Code and which specific provision is breached:
|
Code / Section
|
Violation
|
First offence
|
Repeat / aggravated offence
|
|
Code on Wages, 2019 (Section 54)
|
Paying an employee less than the amount due
|
Fine up to INR50,000
|
Fine up to INR1,00,000 or imprisonment up to 3 months, or both (if repeated within 5 years)
|
|
Contravening any other provision, rule or order under the Code
|
Fine up to INR20,000
|
Fine up to INR40,000 or imprisonment up to 1 month, or both (if repeated within 5 years)
|
|
Non-maintenance or improper maintenance of records
|
Fine up to INR10,000
|
—
|
|
Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (Section 86)
|
Lay-off, retrenchment or closure without the required government permission (Sections 78–80)
|
Fine INR1,00,000–10,00,000
|
Fine INR5,00,000–20,00,000 or imprisonment up to 6 months, or both
|
|
Violating standing orders / notice-of-change provisions (Sections 67, 70, 73, 75)
|
Fine INR50,000–2,00,000
|
Fine INR1,00,000–5,00,000 or imprisonment up to 6 months, or both
|
|
Unfair labour practices (as listed in the Second Schedule)
|
Fine INR10,000–2,00,000
|
Fine INR50,000–5,00,000 or imprisonment, or both
|
|
Breach of a certified standing order
|
Fine INR1,00,000–2,00,000
|
—
|
|
Breach of a binding settlement or award
|
Fine INR20,000–2,00,000 or imprisonment up to 3 months, or both
|
Additional fine up to INR1,000 per day for a continuing breach
|
|
Workers participating in an illegal strike
|
Imprisonment up to 1 month or fine up to INR50,000, or both
|
—
|
|
Employer declaring or continuing an illegal lock-out
|
Imprisonment up to 1 month or fine INR50,000–1,00,000, or both
|
—
|
|
Any other contravention not specifically covered
|
Fine up to INR1,00,000
|
—
|
|
Occupational Safety, Health & Working Conditions Code, 2020
|
A violation that results in an employee's death
|
Imprisonment up to 2 years or fine up to INR5,00,000, or both (courts may direct ≥ 50% of the fine as compensation to the victim's family)
|
—
|
|
Any other contravention where a specific penalty isn't prescribed
|
Fine INR2,00,000–3,00,000
|
If the contravention is continued after the conviction, then, with further penalty which may extend to two thousand rupees for each day till such contravention continues.
|
|
Violation by an employee
|
Fine up to INR10,000
|
—
|
|
Code on Social Security, 2020
|
Failure to pay contributions after deducting the employee's share (PF/ESI)
|
Imprisonment 1–3 years and fine INR1,00,000
|
—
|
|
Failure to pay contributions — other cases
|
Imprisonment 2–6 months and fine INR50,000
|
—
|
|
Deducting the employer's share of contribution from employee wages
|
Fine up to INR50,000
|
—
|
|
Reducing wages or benefits in contravention of the Code
|
Fine up to INR50,000
|
—
|
Most offences that don't carry a standalone imprisonment term can be compounded (settled) by paying up to 50% of the maximum fine, provided it's a first offence — but that window closes once a repeat violation is recorded within the specified period.
How a Company Can Identify If It's Not Compliant
A practical self-check covers six areas:
-
whether appointment letters reflect the new Code definitions;
-
whether basic wage plus allowances meet the 50% wage-in-hand threshold;
-
whether PF, ESI and gratuity contributions have been recalculated on the revised wage base;
-
whether registrations and licences have been renewed under the applicable Central and State rules for every location;
-
whether contract labour, fixed-term and gig-worker engagements are correctly classified and covered; and whether registers, returns and standing orders match the state-specific formats now in force.
If even one of these hasn't been reviewed since November 2025, the establishment is very likely carrying unassessed exposure.
The Indian Market: Where Implementation Actually Stands
There's no official figure for what percentage of Indian companies have “adopted” the Codes — compliance isn't optional, so the more useful question is where the law itself stands. The picture as of September 2026:
-
The four Codes are in force nationally since 21 November 2025, and the Central Rules under all four were notified on 8 May 2026, along with Model Standing Orders for manufacturing and services.
-
Because labour sits on the Concurrent List, states must notify their own rules before the Codes are fully enforceable in that state. A growing number of states have notified final rules under some or all four Codes since early 2026, while others remain at the draft or consultation stage — and the list keeps changing month to month, so it's worth confirming the current position for each state you operate in directly with the state labour department rather than relying on any single published tracker.
The result is a patchwork: depending on the state, the same company can be fully covered under the new rules, partially covered, or still awaiting final notification — with no single national date to point to.
Independent surveys back this up. A V.V. Giri National Labour Institute study of 715 employers (Feb 2026) found 73% expected the Codes to improve ease of doing business, but only 34% had overall clarity on the provisions. Another Economic Times survey of 1,459 companies found just 40% considered themselves fully ready for implementation.
Challenges Companies Are Actually Facing
-
Tracking a moving target: Central and state rules are still being notified and amended, so a compliant policy in June may need revision by September.
-
Payroll restructuring: The 50% wage rule pushes up PF, gratuity and leave-encashment costs (industry estimates put the CTC impact in the mid-single to low-double digits per employee, varying by current salary structure), forcing CTC redesign across the workforce.
-
Multi-state complexity: Registration thresholds, minimum wages and shop & establishment rules differ by state, so a single national HR policy no longer works.
-
New worker categories: Gig, platform and fixed-term employees now carry statutory entitlements (including pro-rata gratuity after one year) that many payroll systems aren't built to handle.
-
Resourcing: HR, payroll, finance and legal teams are all touched, but most mid-size companies don't have in-house bandwidth to interpret and implement changes across all four Codes simultaneously.
Old Laws vs New Codes: What's Simpler, What's Harder
|
Compliance area
|
What's simpler now
|
What's more complex now
|
|
Registrations & licensing
|
Single, largely digital registration replaces separate licences under multiple old Acts (factories, contract labour, shops & establishments in many states).
|
Central rules are notified, but each state issues its own forms, thresholds and portals — multi-state employers still juggle parallel registrations.
|
|
Wage definition
|
One uniform definition of “wages” applies across all four Codes instead of varying definitions in old laws.
|
Wages must now be at least 50% of total remuneration, forcing most companies to restructure CTC and recompute PF, gratuity and bonus liabilities.
|
|
Employment contracts
|
Written appointment letters are now mandatory for every employee, reducing disputes over employment terms.
|
Templates must be redrawn to reflect fixed-term status, standing orders and revised termination clauses.
|
|
Social security coverage
|
One Code consolidates PF, ESI, gratuity, maternity benefit and compensation instead of five separate Acts.
|
Coverage now extends to gig, platform and fixed-term workers, requiring new registration and contribution workflows for categories many companies never tracked before.
|
|
Retrenchment & standing orders
|
Model Standing Orders are notified centrally, giving smaller employers a ready-made template.
|
The government-approval threshold for retrenchment has moved from 100 to 300 employees, changing risk exposure and requiring fresh internal sign-off processes.
|
|
Returns & inspections
|
Common digital registers and a single annual return replace multiple periodic filings.
|
Inspection and self-certification regimes vary by state, and digital-filing readiness differs widely across state portals.
|
|
Penalties
|
Codified, predictable penalty slabs replace scattered, inconsistent fines across 29 old laws.
|
Penalties are steeper across the board, and for the most serious lapses — unauthorised lay-off, retrenchment or closure — can reach INR1–10 lakh for a first offence and INR5–20 lakh with possible imprisonment for a repeat one.
|
In short: the framework is structurally simpler, but the compliance workload during transition — and the cost of getting it wrong — is higher than under the old regime.
How AKM Global Can Help
With the Codes now partially in force and states notifying rules on a rolling basis, the practical need for most employers is an independent, expert view of where they actually stand — not another explainer on the law. AKM Global's tax and regulatory compliance team works with companies across sectors and states on:
-
Labour law compliance audits — a structured review of contracts, wage structures, statutory registers and filings against the applicable Central and State rules, with a clear gap report and remediation plan.
-
Wage and payroll structuring — recomputing CTC, PF, gratuity and bonus in line with the 50% wage definition, so cost impact is modelled before it hits payroll.
-
Ongoing labour law compliance management — ongoing monitoring of registers, returns, licences and renewals across jurisdictions, so nothing lapses as rules keep evolving.
-
Multi-state registrations & licensing — end-to-end support for registrations, licences and approvals across every state an employer operates in, tracked centrally on the company's behalf.
-
Contract and policy redrafting — appointment letters, HR policies and standing orders updated to reflect Code-compliant terms, including fixed-term and contract labour arrangements.
-
Advisory on gig, platform and contract workforce coverage — assessing new social security obligations for non-traditional workers and setting up the compliance process for them.
If your organisation hasn't reviewed its labour law position since the Codes came into force, that review is the logical next step — before an inspection, a dispute or a due-diligence process forces the issue. Reach out to our labour law specialists at info@akmglobal.com to get a clear picture of where your business stands.